One of the the surprising things about the earring group (the fundamental group of the earring space ) is that the group of homomorphisms
to the additive group of integers is countable (see this post for details) even though
is torsion-free and uncountable. In this post we’ll see that the situation is completely different when we replace
with a finite group!
The earring space is the planar subspace where
is the circle of radius
centered at
. The basepoint is the origin
, which is the only point in the intersection of all of the shrinking circles. Let
be the loop traversing
once in the counterclockwise direction and
be its homotopy class.
In this post, we’ll work through the proof of the following result.
Theorem 1: Let be any non-trivial finite group. There are uncountably many surjective group homomorphisms
mapping
to the identity element for every
.
Theorem 1 could be considered “surprising” since every homomorphism from to a free group which kills all classes
must be the trivial homomorphism. An obvious consequence is the following corollary.
Corollary 2: For any non-trivial finite group , the set* of group homomorphism
is uncountable.
*since the finite group
need not be abelian, the hom set
need not have natural group structure.
An anomalous aside
The only place I know of Theorem 1 being proven in the literature is Conner and Spencer’s paper [1] entitled “The anomalous behavior of the Hawaiian earring group.” This is a nice, short paper which clarified some things about the earring group. Conner and Spencer state in the introduction of [1] that “The aim of the current article is to understand some of the anomalous behavior of homomorphisms from the fundamental group of the earring group into finite groups.” According to Theorem 1, the hom-set certainly is large and complicated, however, I’m going to try to convince you in this post that this result really doesn’t have a lot to do with the intricate structure of the earring group. Instead, this craziness is due to the generally complicated behavior of morphisms out of infinite categorical limits (specifically products).
As we break apart the argument in [1], we’ll see that is uncountable essentially because
is uncountable. Similarly, Theorem 1 follows directly from the existence of uncountably many epimorphisms
which vanish on the subgroup of eventually trivial sequences. These algebraic statements about finite groups and their products do not depend on the group structure of
.
The infinite product of n-dimensional projective space (
) exhibits the same sort of “anomalous” behavior since
. So yes, the earring group is quite anomalous, however, this particular anomaly is not unique to
.
Ultrafilters and finite groups
Definition 3: A filter on a set is a non-empty set
of subsets of
satisfying the properties:
- If
, then
,
,
- If
, and
, then
.
A filter is an ultrafilter if for every subset
, either
or
. An ultrafilter
is a non-principal ultrafilter if
does not contain any finite subsets of
.
We’re mainly going to be using non-principal ultrafilters on the natural numbers . The existence of non-principal ultrafilters on infinite sets is equivalent to the axiom of choice. In fact the remainder of the Stone-Cech compactification
is in bijective correspondence with the non-principal ultrafilters on
. In particular, there are uncountably many non-principal ultrafilters on
.
Lemma 4: If is a non-principal ultrafilter on
and
is a finite partition of
, then there is a unique
such that
.
Proof. Suppose for all
. Then
for each
and thus
which is false. Thus
for some
. Suppose
for
. Then
which cannot be. Thus there is a unique
such that
.
Let be a finite group with trivial element
and
be the infinite direct product whose elements are sequences
where
.
Lemma 5: Let be the subgroup of
consisting of sequences
such that
for all but finitely many
. There exists uncountably many epimorphisms
such that
.
Proof. Let be a non-principal ultrafilter on
. We define a homomorphism
. To define
, fix a sequence
. For each
, let
. Since
is finite
is a finite partition of
. According to Lemma 4, there is a unique
such that
. Thus we have a well-defined function
when we set
where
.
claim 1: is a homomorphism. Suppose
is another sequence and
where
. Consequently,
But and
and therefore . It follows from our definition of
that
.
claim 2: is surjective. Let
and pick any set
. If
is the sequence where
then clearly
. Thus
is surjective.
claim 3: . Let
be a sequence such that
for all but finitely many
. Since
is finite when
, we must have
. By definition of
,
.
Claims 1-3 guarantee the existence of a desired epimorphism for each non-principal ultrafilter
. We check uniqueness last.
claim 4: if
. If
is a non-principal ultrafilter, distinct from
, there is an infinite set
such that
and
. Pick
and define a sequence
by
. Then
and
. Thus
.
Since there are uncountably many non-principal ultrafilters on , we have proved the lemma.
Remark: In Lemma 5 we basically defined a canonical injection
.
Corollary 6: For any non-trivial finite group , the hom-sets
and
are uncountable.
Completing the proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1. Suppose has generating set
and let
be the free group on these generators. Let
be the canonical epimorphism induced by the inclusion
.
Let be the first wedge of m-circles,
be the next m-circles, and so on. Thus
. Since each of these spaces is a wedge of m-circles, we have
for each
. The retraction
, which collapses all other circles to the basepoint, induces a surjection
on fundamental groups. Together, these surjections induce a canonical surjection
,
. The argument that
is a surjection is essentially the same as the one we used to show
is uncountable. We’re going to work with the surjective composition:
Pre-composition with defines a function
. In detail,
.
Notice that is injective since it is precisely the function
induced by the hom-functor
from the category of groups to the category of sets. Since
is an epimorphism in
,
is a monomorphism in
…or you could just check directly that
is injective using the fact that
and
are surjective. Since we’ve embedded an uncountable set into
, this hom-set must be uncountable (this proves Corollary 2). We still need to finish the stronger statement of Theorem 1.
We’ll use two other facts that are easy observations about :
Fact I: If is surjective, then so is
.
Fact II: For fixed , the image
can only be non-trivial if
for a unique
.
Recall from Lemma 5 that there are uncountably many epimorphisms such that
. Fact II implies that, for each
, we have
since this sequence is non-trivial in at most one component. Thus for each of the uncountably many surjections
constructed in Lemma 5, we have a unique (since
is injective) surjection (by Fact I)
such that
for each . This completes the proof of Theorem 1.
References.
[1] G. Conner, K. Spencer, Anomalous behavior of the Hawaiian earring group, Journal of Group Theory 8 (2005) 223-227.
Pingback: Homomorphisms from the harmonic archipelago group to finite groups | Wild Topology