This post gives another look at the locally path-connected coreflection that I’ve found quite interesting and useful. For the previous posts see Part I and Part II. In this post, we’ll be motivated by the following two basic observations.
Lemma 1: The topological sum of a family of locally path-connected spaces
is locally path-connected.
Lemma 2: The quotient of a locally path-connected space is locally path-connected.
Proof. Let be a quotient map where
is locally path-connected. Let
be an open set in
and
be a non-empty path-component of
. It suffices to check that
is open in
. Since
is quotient, we need to check that
is open in
. If
, then there is an open, path connected neighborhood
such that
. We claim that
. Let
and
be a path from
to
. Then
is a path from
to
. Since
is the path component of
in
, the path
must have image entirely in
. Thus
has image in
. In particular,
.
denotes the usual category of topological spaces and continuous functions. Here is an important definition from Categorical Topology.
Definition 3: Let be a subcategory of
. The coreflective hull of
is the full subcategory
of
consisting of all spaces which are the quotient of a topological sum (i.e. disjoint union) of spaces in
.
Certainly . Moreover, the coreflective hull is the category “generated” by the collection of spaces
in the following sense: the inclusion
has a right adjoint (called a coreflection)
. In particular,
is the space with the same underlying set as
but a set
is open if and only if
is open in
for every map
where
. In short,
has the final topology with respect to the collection of all maps from spaces in
to
.
In the case when is the category of locally path-connected spaces, it follows from Lemmas 1 and 2 that
is it’s own coreflective hull. Thus the locally path-connected coreflection
discussed in depth in previous posts (Part I and Part II) is precisely the right adjoint. The reason for singling out
among other coreflective subcategories of spaces is that (1) local path-connectivity is important in (particularly wild) algebraic topology and (2) the functor
has a remarkably simple description: the topology of
is generated by the path-components of the open sets of
.
It turns out there is an even simpler way to generate as a coreflective subcategory. I first learned about the following general construction from some fantastic unpublished notes [1] of Jerzy Dydak.
Definition 4: Let be a directed set. The directed wedge of a collection of spaces
indexed by
is the wedge sum
(given by identifying the basepoints
to a single point
) with the following topology: A set
is open if and only if
is open in
for every
.
- if
, then there is a
such that
for all
.
In particular if is the unit interval for every
, then
is the
-arc-hedgehog.
Example 5: If is the natural numbers, then the
-arc hedgehog space is the space
of a sequence of shrinking intervals joined at a point.
In the case that and
is the unit circle. The directed wedge
is the earring space.
Lemma 6: If is a collection of path-connected and locally path-connected spaces, then
is path-connected and locally path-connected.
In particular, arc-hedgehogs are path-connected and locally-path connected.
Theorem 7: Let be the subcategory of all
-arc hedgehogs. Then
.
Proof. Since every arc-hedgehog is locally path-connected, have and thus
. For the other inclusion, suppose
is locally path-connected. Suppose
. Clearly if
is open, then
is open in
for every map
. For the converse, suppose
is not open. There exists a point
such that for every path-connected neighborhood
of
, there is a point
. Let
be the directed set of path-connected neighborhoods
of
. For each
, find a path
from
to
. Define a map
so that the restriction to the
-th arc is the path
. It is easy to see that
is continuous based on how we defined the topology of
. Since
, we have
, however, if
denotes the end of the
-th arc
, then
. Thus
for all
. It follows that
cannot be open since
is a net in
converging to the joining point
.
Thus the topology of a locally path-connected space is entirely determined by maps from arc-hedgehog spaces. Notice that if
is first countable, then we only need to use the
-arc hedgehog
.
References:
[1] Dydak, J. Coverings and fundamental groups: a new approach. Preprint. arXiv:1108.3253
This is beautiful, thanks for writing it!
In a 1963 paper of Gleason (Gleason, A.M., 1963. Universal locally connected refinements. Illinois J. Math. 7, 521–531.), the last section goes further and claims without proof that in fact the locally path-connected spaces are the coreflective hull of the singleton category consisting of the unit interval. I find Gleason’s claim suspicious because this would imply that your arc-hedgehogs are quotients of disjoint unions of intervals. Do you know if this is true?
LikeLike
Good question Tim. The coreflective hull of the category whose only object is the unit interval is sometimes called the category of delta(
)-generated spaces (because it is also the coreflective hull of n-simplices
). Certainly, every
-generated space is locally path-connected. While it is true that a first countable, locally path-connected space is
-generated, the full converse is not true. So if what I write is correct, then you’re right that an arc-hedgehog had better provide an answer. Indeed, if
is the first uncountable ordinal in which there are no cofinal countable sets, then
is locally path-connected but not
-generated. To see this, first convince yourself that a path in
can only intersect finitely many arcs. This means the subset
is not open in
even though
is open for every path
.
LikeLike
Ah, thanks! I was indeed interested in this question because it would be remarkable if the $\Delta$-generated spaces coincided with the locally path-connected spaces and yet they had different names! Thinking about it some more, I think another argument would be that since the unit interval has countable tightness — is in fact sequential — and countably tight / sequential spaces are closed under colimits, it follows that every $\Delta$-generated space has countable tightness. But locally path-connected spaces — the arc-hedgehogs for long chains, for instance — can have arbitrarily large tightness.
LikeLike
In your proof of Lemma 2, you say “Then q\circ\alpha:[0,1]\to q(V)\subseteq U is a path from f(x)\in C to v.” I didn’t see f defined previously in the proof. What does it refer to?
LikeLike
Sorry I didn’t see this earlier. It was a typo. The “f” should be “q.” It’s fixed now.
LikeLike
Pingback: Shape Injectivity of the Hawaiian Earring Part II | Wild Topology
Pingback: The locally path-connected coreflection | Wild Topology
Pingback: The locally path-connected coreflection (Part II) | Wild Topology