In Part I, we discussed the operation , which takes in a group equipped with a topology (that does not necessarily interact nicely with the operations of the group) and outputs a topological group. The underlying group of
is the same as
but the topology of
is coarser than that of
. The construction ensures that
if and only if
is a topological group.
In this post we’re going to show that is a functor and consider the consequences of this fact. Before that recall the inductive construction of
requires a step-construction
where
is
equipped with the quotient topology inherited by the map
,
. Using this, we start with
with topology
and recursively define
for each ordinal
and let
denote the topology of
. If
is a limit ordinal then
is the group
equipped with the topology
.
The main idea of the construction is that for any given group with topology , the transfinite sequence
of groups with topology eventually stabilizes at a topological group
.
We consider two categories. Let will denote the category of groups with topology and where the morphisms are continuous group homomorphisms. Let
denote the category of topological groups and continuous homomorphisms. Note that
is a full subcategory of
and so we have an inclusion functor
.
Lemma 1: is a functor.
Proof. We have already defined on objects. Let
be a continuous group homomorphism. We define
to be the same function
. Once we show that
is continuous, the conditions of being a functor follow easily. Recall that
,
and
,
are quotient maps by definition. We have
and thus .
Since this composition is continuous and is quotient, the map
is continuous by the universal property of quotient maps.
Theorem 2: For every ordinal ,
is a functor when we define
to be the homomorphism
on underlying groups.
Proof. This proof is by transfinite induction. Lemma 1 shows that is a functor and if
is a functor, then so is
. Thus it suffices to focus on the limit ordinal case and show that
is continuous when
is a limit ordinal. Our induction hypothesis is that
is a functor for all
. Thus
is continuous for all
. To show that
is continuous, let
. For fixed
, we have
and since
is continuous,
. Thus
. We conclude that
is continuous.
.
Theorem 3: is a functor when we define
to be the homomorphism
on underlying groups.
Proof. We have already defined on objects (see Part I for details). Let
be a continuous homomorphism of groups with topology. Find ordinals
and
with
and
. Set
. Then
and
. Since
is a functor by Theorem 2, we conclude that
is continuous.
.
Using functorality, we can easily verify the “universal property” of the construction .
Theorem 4: If is a group with topology,
is a topological group and
is a continuous group homomorphism, then
is also continuous.
Proof. Recall that the topology of is coarser than that of
so this is not completely obvious. However, we do know that
is
is assumed to be a topological group. Therefore, applying the functor
to
, we have
is continuous.
.
Corollary 5: The topology of is the finest topology on the underlying group of
, which is (1) coarser than that of
and (2) is a group topology (makes the group operations continuous).
Proof. Suppose denotes the group
with a topology that is (1) coarser than that of
and (2) a group topology. (2) implies that the identity function
is continuous. Using (1), we may apply Theorem 4, which implies that
is continuous. Thus that topology of
is finer than that of
.
.
Conclusion
Theorem 4 implies that is a reflection functor in the sense that it is left adjoint to the inclusion functor
. That is, for a topological group latex
and group with topology
, there is a natural bijection
that is the identity on homomorphisms of the underlying groups.
This provides a sense in which the construction becomes the most efficient way one can turn a group with topology
(including quasitopological groups). If
is not a topological group and
is group multiplcation, then there is some open set
where
is not open in
. This construction tells us to throw that set
away. Keep throwing away problematic open sets like this until one ends up with only open sets
where
is open. We had to use transfinite induction to show that such a procedure is possible. That it worked out shows that it is indeed possible to “remove” a smallest number of open sets from the topology of
until a topological group is obtained.

Pingback: How to “topologize” the fundamental group: a primer | Wild Topology
Pingback: The “tau topology” on the fundamental group | Wild Topology
Pingback: Topological Group Reflections: turning a group with topology into a topological group, Part I | Wild Topology